|
KMID : 0371020050380010025
|
|
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
2005 Volume.38 No. 1 p.25 ~ p.37
|
|
|
Epidemiology of Psychosocial Distress in Korean Employees
|
|
Chang Sei-Jin
Ha Eun-Hee
Cho Jung-Jin
Woo Jong-Min
Kim Hyeong-Su
Kim Sung-Ah
Lee Kyung-Jae
Hyun Sook-Jung
Park Jong-Ku
Koh Sang-Baek
Park Jun-Ho
Kang Dong-Mug
Kang Myung-Gun
Ha Mi-Na
Chang Seong-Sil
Park Jung-Sun
Cha Bong-Suk
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Objective: To estimate the magnitude of psychosocial distress and examine eligible factors associated with the development of psychosocial distress in Korean employees, using a nationwide sample.
Methods: A total of 6,977 workers were recruited from 245 companies. A structured questionnaire was used to assess sociodemographics, health-related behaviors, job characteristics, social support at work, personality traits (locus of control, type A behavior pattern), self-esteem, and psychosocial distress.
Results: The results showed that 23% of workers were categorized as high stress, 73% as moderate, and 5% as normal. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that psychosocial distress was more common in younger workers, both male and female. Regular exercise was negatively associated with increase of psychosocial distress. In job characteristics, as expected, low decision latitude, high job insecurity, and low social support at work were related to high psychosocial distress. Personality traits such as locus of control and type A behavior pattern, and self-esteem were more powerful predictors of psychosocial distress than general characteristics, health-related behavior, and job characteristics. There were some gender differences. While men who are less educated and single (unmarried, divorced, and separated) experienced higher levels of psychosocial distress than those who are educated and married, women who feel high job demand experienced higher levels of psychosocial distress than those who feel low job demand.
Conclusions: The proportion of the high stress group was higher than expected, and psychosocial factors like social support and personality characteristics (e. g. locus of control, type A behavior pattern and self-esteem) were more significant factors for psychosocial distress than other variables. This finding suggests that some psychosocial factors, especially inadequate social support, low self-esteem and lack of internal locus of control for the development of psychosocial distress, will also operate as an intervention strategy in the worksite stress reduction program. It is strongly required that worksite stress reduction programs should be established in at both occupational and level as well as in individual levels.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Stress, Epidemiology, Social support
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
 
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
  
|
|